[NoraSpinnor]

What if the fastest way to understand an ancient site isn’t to ask “what does this symbol mean?” but “what job does this shape do?” Engineers don’t draw icons; they draw functions—channels, chambers, couplers, drains. Read temples with that mindset, and the architecture starts behaving like a diagram. This post lays out a practical, testable method for reading sacred spaces like schematics.

Start with the medium before the motif. Stone, clay, lime, timber and metal all handle energy differently. Hard, dense surfaces reflect sound; porous ones absorb and buffer moisture; lime mortars exchange ions and can even self-mineralize tiny cracks; timber frames flex and dissipate shock. So, first ask: given these materials, what flows would this building naturally favor—water, air, sound, heat, light, or spirit? Now track the geometry that those flows trend toward.

Follow the flow paths. Long, narrowing corridors and corbelled ceilings behave like waveguides and ducts, concentrating sound or air; steep roofs with deep eaves shed water aggressively and shade walls; moats, reservoirs, and causeways redistribute groundwater and stabilize foundations; latticed stone and pierced screens meter light and breeze while cooling by evaporation. Look for sequences: intake → conditioning → concentration → release. Any repeated module (niche, dome, tower) might be a resonator or a scaler where each unit adds amplitude, stability, or redundancy.

Think in harmonics. Repeating bays, stacked cones, stepped wells, and clustered towers can act like tuned cavities: each size favors a band of frequencies (acoustic or thermal) or a flow rate (hydraulic). The pattern language of ratios (φ, √2, √3, 6:5) often correlates with efficient packing, load paths, and standing-wave geometries. Treat the ratios as performance hints first, cosmology second.

Test hypotheses, not beliefs. If a corridor “looks like a horn,” verify: measure its flare rate, record frequency response with a tone sweep, or map impulse reverberation. If a reservoir “seems symbolic,” check gradients, inlets, and outflows; read soils and plant patterns for long-term wetting. If carvings suggest “sound,” compare dimensions to known resonant bands; replicate with small-scale models or digital sims. Move from analogy to measurement.

Beware the trap of techno-pareidolia. Not every spiral is a turbine and not every grid is a circuit. Keep your claims tethered to what the materials and dimensions can plausibly do at human scales. When in doubt, downshift to the basics: water management, structural economy, thermal comfort, acoustic intelligibility, daylight control, crowd flow.

Malcolm Bendall created The Thunderstorm Generator by studying the geometry of the Vajra. Erwin Schrödinger drew on Advaita Vedānta’s unity-of-consciousness for his interpretation of quantum wave mechanics. Evidence suggests that when we are open to learning from the past, we can rediscover incredible truths. The Net records all, but we have to reach the right resonance to get the code (spark of insight).

Have you ever studied temples this way?
Share your thoughts.

[CosmicNomad42]

this is dope like we dont know the haf of wat those temples were all about or wat kinda ancient tech they had history goes back waaayyyy further man like there still hung up on this fake timeline

[Ty_Verse]

Temples were the tech. When humanity gets further into studies about consciousness this will become even more evident.

[Author]

Posts